The Effects of Students Perception on Learning Method And Students Interest Towards Students Reading Comprehension Skill (A Survey at State Vocational High School in Purwakarta)
(1) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(2) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Abstract
The aim of this research are: 1) Showing The Effect of Students perception on learning method and Students Interest Towards Students Reading Comprehension Skill, 2) Showing The Effect of Students perception on learning method Towards Students Reading Comprehension Skill, 3) The Effect of Students Interest Towards Students Reading Comprehension Skill. This research use quantitative method. Research that uses a survey approach, the populations of tenth grade, as many as 537 students, and the sample as many as 81 students, analysis use t test and F test. Based on data analysis in the previous chapter, the following conclusions were obtained: 1) There is a significant effect of students perception towards reading comprehension skill at State Vocational High School in Purwakarta. That is proved by sig. value =0,04<0,05. It means that there is significance different Students reading comprehension skill whose positive perception with students reading comprehension skill whose negative perception. 2) There is significant effect of Students interest towards students reading comprehension skill at State Vocational High School in Purwakarta. That is proved by sig. value =0,044<0,05. It means that there is significance different Students reading comprehension skill whose high interest with students reading comprehension skill whose low interest. 3) There are any significant interactive effects of Students perception on learning method and Students Interest towards Students Reading Comprehension Skill at State Vocational High School in Purwakarta. That is proved by sig. value =0.000<0,05.
Key Words: students perception; students interest; reading comprehension skill
Full Text:
PDFReferences
REFERENCES
Airasian, P.W. Mills, G. & Gay, L.R. (2012). Educational Research: Compentencies For Analysis And Application. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Arikuto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Asdi
Mahasatya.
Arikuto, S. (2008). Dasar Dasar Evaluasi. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment. San Francisco: Pearson Education. Inc.
Chaer, A. (2009). Psikolingustik: Kajian Teoritik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Juge, F., Moskal, P., & Sorg, S. (2006). Blended learning enters the mainstream. The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, 195208.
Endorat, S. (2014). Makalah Pendidikan Bahasa Faktor Usia dalam Pemerolehan Bahasa Kedua". Retrieved March 29, 2018, from https://amortallearner.net/2014/11/26/faktor-usia-dalam-pemerolehan-bahasa-kedua/
Faizah, D. U., Sufyadi, S., Anggraini, L., Waluyo, Dawayani, S., Muldian, W., & Roosaria, D. R. (2016). Panduan Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di SD. Indonesia.
Frankel, K. K., Becker, B. L., Rowe, M. W., & Pearson, P. D. (2016). From what is reading? to what is literacy?. Journal of Education, 196(3), 7-17
Harmer, J. (2007). How to Teach English. Oxford: Pearson Education Inc.
Harris, D. P. (1969). Testing English as a Second Language.New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hirsch, E.D. (2006). Building knowledge: The Case For Bringing Content Into The Language Arts Block and for a Knowledge-Rich Curriculum Core for All Children. American Educator. Vol.30 8-29.
Husamah, H. (2014). Pembelajaran bauran (Blended learning). Hasil Pustaka
Jaya, A.M. & Rohmadi A.F. (2008). English Revolution, 3rd Ed. Jepara: Mawas Press.
J. Bergmann and A. Sams. (2012) Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. Washington, D.C.: International Society for Technology in Education (ICTE)
Kurniawan, M. Y., & Slamet, M. S. (2016). Peningkatan Keterampilan Membaca Pemahaman Dengan Menggunakan Strategi Directed Reading Thinking Activity (Drta). Jurnal Didaktika Dwijaya Indria, 4(4), 16.
Murtono. (2015). Cooperative Learning Model toward a Reading Comprehensions on the Elementary School. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18), 208215. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1773219246?accountid=8330.
Marboot, K., Roohani, A., & Mirzaei, A. (2020). Investigating Iranian EFL students metacognitive online reading strategies, critical thinking, and their relationship: A mixed-methods study. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), 9(1), 151-182.
Margono, S. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Asdi Mahasatya.
Nana Sudjana. (2005). Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : Sinar Baru Algasindo.
Patricia, R., & Amanto. (2010). Putting It All Together: Some Practical Issues Making it Happen From Interactive to Participatory Language Teaching, Evolving Theory and Practice. London: Pearson Longman.
P. Jakkaew, and S. Hemrungrote (2017) Deployment of Google Classroom to Enhance SDL Cognitive Skills: A Case Study of Introduction to Information Technology Course. International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology (ICDAMT)
Rahim, F. (2019). Pengajaran Membaca di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Roller, C. (2000). The International Reading Association responds to a highly charged policy environment. The Reading Teacher. Vol. 53: 626639.
Saeed, Sitwat and Zyngier D. (2012). How Motivation Influence Student Engagement : A Qualitative Case Study. Journal of Education and Learning. Vol.1 (2): 252-267.
Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The modern language journal, 85(1), 39-56.
Smith, A., & Feng, J. (2018). Literature Circle and Gifted Students: Boosting Reading Motivation and Performance. Online Submission, 136.
Smith P, Henry and Emerald V, Dechani. (1961). Psychology in Teaching Reading.USA: Prentice-Hall.
Sugiyono. (2012). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Turkeltaub, P. E. ., Flowers, D. L., Zeffiro, T. A., Eden, G. F., & Gareau, L. (2003). Development of neural mechanisms for reading. Nature Neuroscience, 6(7), 767773.
William, G. & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and Researching Reading. London:
Pearson Education Longman.
W. S. Albiladi and K. K. Alshareef, (2019). Blended learning in English teaching and learning: a review of the current literature in: J. Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 232, doi: 10.17507/jltr.1002.03.
Yovanoff, P., Duesbery, L., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2005). Grade?Level Invariance of a Theoretical Causal Structure Predicting Reading Comprehension With Vocabulary and Oral Reading Fluency. Educational Measurement, 24(3).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/inference.v6i3.11019
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Pascasarjana Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Address: English Education Program, Campus A Building 2, 3rd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia. |
|
|