The Effects of Neurolinguistic Programming (NlP) Methods Towards Students Speaking Skill
(1) Indraprasta PGRI University
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The objective of this research is to investigate the effects of Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) method towards students speaking skill at Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Saadatuddarain 2 Tangerang Selatan. This research was conducted at Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Saadatuddarain 2 Tangerang Selatan from April 15th 2016-July 15th 2016. By using purposive sampling technique, 60 out of 300 students of grade V in school year 2015-2016 were chosen. The method used was a survey with a correlational technique. The instrument included one test to analyze the data quantitatively. Test is used to assess the students speaking skill. There is a positive and significant impact of students that learning using NLP method in the ability of speaking English. Furthermore, ? = 0.05, df = 19, and t-table = 1.73, while tcount = 9, 26. Thus tcount> ttable, this means that H0is rejected and H1is accepted, As conclusion, NLP method affects positively and significantly to the students speaking English ability compared with conventional method.
Key words: Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP) method, speaking skill, English learning
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bandler, R., & John. (1975). The Structure of Magic I: A Book about Language and Therapy. Science and behavior Books Inc.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principle of Language Learning. San Fransisco: State University.
_____. (2014). Language Assessment. Longman Press.
Devilly, G. J. (2005). Power therapies and possible threats to the science of psychology and psychiatry. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39(6), 437-445.
Druckman, D. (2004). Be all that you can be: enhancing human performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(11), 2234-2260.
Gelso, C.J., & Fassinger, R.E. (1990). Counseling psychology: theory and research on interventions. Annual Review of Psychology. 41(1): 355386.
Jackson, H. (2011). An Introduction to the Nature and Functions of Language. Continuum: Australia.
Luoma, Sari. (2009). Assesing Speaking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Masters, B. R., Rawlins, M., & Weidner, L. J. (1991). The NLP Swish pattern: an innovative visualizing technique. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 13(1), 7990.
Millrood, R. (2004). The role of NLP in teachers classroom discourse. ELT Journal, 58(1), 28-37.
Nurgiantoro, B. (1995). Penilaian dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra: Edisi 2. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Patel, Dr. M.F. (2008). English Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T.S. (2003). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Riyono, A. (2012). Teaching English communication skills with NLP. Encounter, 1(3).
Sailendra, A. (2014). Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP): Cetakan II. Yogyakarta: Bhafana Publishing.
Sharpley, C. F. (1987). Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory? Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(1), 103107.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/scope.v2i01.2273
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018
Publisher:
Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
Department:
Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
Kampus A Building 3, 2nd Floor | Jl. Nangka No. 58 C (TB. Simatupang), Kel. Tanjung Barat, Kec. Jagakarsa, Jakarta Selatan 12530, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Work Hours: 09.00 AM – 08.00 PM Best hours to visit: From 9 am to 11 am or after 3 pm. The busiest times are between 11 am and 3 pm.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License